Sushil Kumar v. State Of Punjab




    
       Date of decision: 19th October, 2015  Sushil Kumar

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

 !
"#  $ Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has since been arrested and thus, the present petition has become infructuous.

Dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

#  !
$   %&'()*"  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.19 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court