Bhola Singh Etc. v. Smt. Chatin Kaur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA-492-2000 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.05.2024 Bhola Singh and Ors.

... Appellant(s)

Versus

Chatin Kaur and Ors.

... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Present:

Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondents.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the appellants states that he has no instructions in the matter.

2.

Fresh notices were issued by the Registry. As per the office report, appellant Nos.1, 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22 and 23 are stated to have died. Appellant Nos.2, 3, 4, 11, 14, 17 and 20 stand duly served. Appellant Nos.6, 7, 8 and 24 remain unserved as they are stated to be married and residing with their in-laws. No one has come forward to get themselves impleaded as legal representatives of the appellant Nos.1, 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22 and 23 nor any counsel has put in appearance on their behalf. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant Nos.2, 3, 4, 11, 14, 17 and 20 despite service. This is the only address of the appellant Nos.6, 7, 8 and 24 which was given in the memo of parties as well as in the judgments and decrees of both the Courts. In view Yogesh Sharma 2024.05.28 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

High Court Chandigarh

RSA-492-2000 (O&M) -2thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution.

3.

Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

27.05.2024 Yogesh Sharma ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Yogesh Sharma 2024.05.28 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

High Court Chandigarh