Ranjeev Kumar v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-31397 of 2017 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-31397 of 2017 Date of Decision: 05.2.2018 Ranjeev Kumar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Sarika Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pawan Sharda, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. P.L.Singla, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 144 dated 13.7.2017, registered under Sections 406, 498-A IPC, Police Station Goraya, District Jalandhar. Mediation has failed.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 7.11.2017, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 7.11.2017 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.02.06 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-31397 of 2017 -2conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i) (ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE February 05, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.02.06 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh