Sikander Singh v. State Of Punjab




    
    

 Date of decision: 28th September, 2015  Sikander Singh

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Gursimran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

 !
"#  $ Heard.

The supplementary bail application has been filed in the light of earlier orders of this Court passed in bail application bearing CRM3M No.7736 of 2015 wherein due to pure clerical inadvertent error learned counsel for the petitioner had mentioned the name of petitioner Sikander Singh as son of Manjit Singh when it ought to have been Sikander Singh son of Surjit Singh.

Since the petitioner had earlier been granted regular bail by this Court and being a pure inadvertent clerical error, the same is RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.29 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

 allowed to be rectified and the supplementary bail application is allowed in those terms in the light of previous orders. #  !
$   !%&'%()%* "


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.29 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court