Cheno Ram Kundal v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M-3143-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3143-2015 Date of Decision: February 01, 2016 Cheno Ram Kundal .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Ms.Isha Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Harpal Singh, Station House Officer, Police Station, Tarsika, District Amritsar, submits that within two months after completion of the investigation, the report under Section 173, Cr.P.C., would be presented before learned Area Judicial Magistrate. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner MEENU 2016.02.03 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-3143-2015 -2does not press this petition, at this stage. Ordered accordingly.

February 01, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.02.03 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh