Naib Raj v. Ramesh Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.209-2 RSA-616-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.10.2025 NAIB RAJ ...Appellant

Versus

RAMESH KUMAR ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- None for the appellant.

Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate and Ms. Shikha, Advocate for the respondent.

***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the appellant despite due intimation.

Even on the last date of hearing, none had appeared for the appellant. The position remains the same today. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 27.10.2025 JUDGE Anu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No ANU 2025.10.28 12:01 I am the author of this document Chandigarh