Pardeep Kumar v. State Of Punjab




    
    

  Date of decision: 22nd September, 2015  Pardeep Kumar  Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab  Respondent     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. SPS Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

Mr. R.S. Rangpuri, Advocate for the complainant.

 "
#$ !% Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Pardeep Kumar in case FIR No.93 dated 07.06.2014 registered at Police Station city Sri Muktsar Sahib under Sections 498A IPC.

Learned State counsel has placed on record short affidavit of Mr.Kanwalpreet Singh, PPS, DSP, Sri Muktsar Sahib on behalf of the respondent/State. The same is taken on record. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.22 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that in consequence of the orders of interim bail dated 17.09.2014 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation, is not controverted by learned State counsel.

In the light of what has been stated above and keeping in view that seven years have elapsed and there is no entrustment of Istri Dhan much less any breach of trust qua them, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 17.09.2014 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. $  "
%   "&'(&)*&+

#


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.22 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court