Jasvinder Singh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32397-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: September 23, 2016 Jasvinder Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr. S.K. Bhoria, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Chopra, D.A.G., Haryana, for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner-Jasvinder Singh has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 106 dated 17.08.2015, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 201 & 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Raipur Rani.

Notice of motion has been issued in this case. Mr. Vikas Chopra, learned D.A.G., Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel and gone through the record.

From the record, I find that FIR in the present case has been registered on the statement of complainant Ajit Singh. The allegations of the prosecution are that Amar Singh and his son Jasbir Singh, whose name is mentioned in the petition as Jasvinder Singh, entered into an agreement to Satyawan 2016.09.24 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-32397-2016 -2sell dated 5.10.2011 with complainant Ajit Singh and received ` 4 lacs as earnest money and has not executed sale deed and even the draft sale deed, which was scribed on the stamp papers, has been taken away by the petitioner.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.05.2016. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case, therefore, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

23.09.2016 (INDERJIT SINGH) sp JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2016.09.24 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh