Sushil Kumar v. Sangat Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR-1957 of 2020 Date of decision: 29.06.2020 Sushil Kumar ......Petitioner versus Sangat Singh ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Sanjeev Pandit, Advocate, for the petitioner. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Petitioner-tenant has filed this revision against order dated 27.02.2020 (Annexure P-6) of the Executing Court, dismissing objection of the petitioner-objector-judgment-debtor.

After arguing at length, when the Bench was dismissing this revision, learned counsel for the petitioner sought three months time to vacate the demised shop.

In view of above request, petitioner is granted three months' time from today to vacate the demised shop, failing which he shall pay use and occupation charges @ `10,000/- per month w.e.f. the date of passing of the impugned judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 24.03.2015 till handing over of vacant possession of the demised shop. Petitioner is directed to file affidavit in this respect before the Executing Court within a week from today.

Disposed of.

(Ramendra Jain) June 29, 2020 Judge R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.06.29 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document