Harjinder Singh And ORS v. Seema Jain And ANR

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh C.O.C.P. No. 1017 of 2022 Date of Decision: 19.07.2022 Harjinder Singh and Others ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Ms. Seema Jain and Another ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Sudan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

Complaining willful non-compliance of the order dated 24.11.2021, the petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The operative part of the order dated 24.11.2021 reads as under:- "In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, this writ petition is disposed off with direction to competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid legal notice (P-10) in accordance with law by passing speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order".

2.

Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.07.20 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the instructions of Mr. Nalin Yadav, IFS, Divisional Forest Officer,

C.O.C.P. No. 1017 of 2022 Jalandhar, has stated that the order has been complied with and the recommendations have been made to release the pension to the petitioners. 3.

In view of the aforesaid facts, no further order is required to be passed. Hence, the present petition is disposed of. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge July 19, 2022 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.07.20 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document