Dilbagh Singh v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No.31621 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1) CRM-M No.31621 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 9.1.2018 ...

Dilbagh Singh ................Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent 2) CRM-M No.37716 of 2017 (O&M) ...

Paramjit Singh ................Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Bhavesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, Senior DAG, Punjab.

None for the complainant.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Amarjit Singh, states that as a result of enquiry conducted by SP (D), Tarn Taran, petitioners - Dilbagh Singh and Paramjit Singh, have been found to be innocent, as such they are not required to be arrested in this case at this stage.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that some Banita Chugh 2018.01.10 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M No.31621 of 2017 -2protection be provided to the petitioners because if at any stage they are required to be arrested, then advance notice be given to them. Learned State counsel submits that if as a result of further investigation, the petitioners are required to be arrested, then 7 days notice in writing, would be given to them.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he be permitted to withdraw both the petitions. Both the petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn. ( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 9.1.2018 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2018.01.10 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh