Pawan Kumar Goyal v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-3170 of 2017 Date of decision : 19.05.2017 Pawan Kumar Goyal ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for quashing of F.I.R No. 105 dated 26.03.2014 registered under Sections 323/406/498-A/506 IPC at P.S. Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala Learned counsel submits that petitioner is father-in-law and the allegations against him are general in nature. This Court referred the matter to Mediation Centre and parties mediated today with Ms. Kamalpreet Kaur, Mediator who stated that petitioner has made an offer of Rs.50 lacs towards full and final settlement, which is being declined by the complainant and her father.

Keeping in view the above fact, this petition is being disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to take all the pleas before the trial Court. Further, the personal appearance of the petitioner is exempted before the trial Court, subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as an accused: (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. 19.05.2017 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.05.22 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh