Meena Chaudhary v. State Of Haryana And ANR










 

 






 !"

!

#






CRM-M-32647-2018 (O&M)
MEENA CHAUDHARY  



 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER











 
CRM-M-33592-2018 SANTOSH SHARMA  



 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER











 
 $

 %&
$
 '
( 
'
 )





*****
  


 
 




 



!

"
 

 




 
#

$
% 
 


!



 
& 







'''''
( 
'
 )+

, -./ Both these petitions challenging the order dated 07.07.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal whereby the application moved by the petitioner(s) under Section 218 Cr. P.C. for separation of VISHAL SHARMA 2026.04.30 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-32647-2018 (O&M) & CRM-M-33592-2018 -2-
hearing had been dismissed and charges have been framed against the petitioner(s)-accused, are being decided by a common order. 2.

Counsel for the respondent No.2 points out that notice in the matter was issued only to explore the possibility of resolution of the dispute. The contention of the petitioner in this regard is specifically noticed in the order dated 02.08.2018 passed in CRM-M-32647-2018. Thereafter, on the next date, the trial Court was directed to adjourn the case beyond the date fixed by this Court solely for the purpose of an amicable resolution of the dispute and its settlement thereof.

3.

It is pointed out that despite lapse of nearly 08 years, no settlement has been arrived at between the parties and that even the Mediation proceedings before this Court have failed. 4.

The aforesaid contention of respondent No.2 is not disputed by the Counsel for the petitioner.

5.

 

 
!



"
(
 

)$
!

"


 
!
*)

+
"
  ( ) $
!
 ()
 ) 

!
"
  
(,
"
  
( 
"
 
"


(
)
" !


"
  
 


 
  

"
")) +

"



 
"
) $
(
+ 

-

))
"
  +
 )) 


) 

./
!
 $
 
)
  
!
s






,( 
'
 )/



&
+
!

#










 
  
0""
1 +2 



32&



0""


()


32&
VISHAL SHARMA 2026.04.30 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document