Devinder Singh & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS
Date of decision: 28th April, 2016 Devinder Singh and others
Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
Respondents ! " "
Present:
Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.
Mr. Arun Sood, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3.
"#$ !% Report dated 26.04.2016 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Malerkotla has been received whereby after recording statements of complainants Muhammad Sakeel and Charanpreet Singh Sidhu and the accused persons namely Devinder Singh and Jaswinder Singh (petitioners No.1 and 2 respectively), the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure; reporting further that accused petitioner No.3 Jivan Kumar did not appear to make any statement. Heard.
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure money dispute and the offences for which the accused have RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.05.06 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in &'() "')*+,"-(-. /)0(1()2()-+.3
$4% $3'5')(6%4 and &7/68')2.3"')*+()2-+.39,"-(-. /)0(1()2()-+.3
: $% $3'5')(6%
# the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.60 dated 10.07.2015 registered at Police Station Amargarh, District Sangrur under Sections 420/120;B IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua petitioners No.1 and 2 are quashed.
Resultantly, the present petition stands allowed qua petitioners No.1 and 2 and dismissed qua petitioner No.3. $ "% ;3'6<#
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.05.06 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court