Tarlok Chand And ANR v. State Of Punjab




    
    

    Date of decision: 18th August, 2015 Tarlok Chand and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents  !  "#  $
  $
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for respondent No.2.

 $
%

#  Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement before this Court withdrawing the present petition. However a prayer has been made that the matter be ordered to be expeditiously disposed off by the trial Court.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

In the totality of circumstances, both the petitioners being senior citizens, it will subserve the ends of justice if necessary directions are issued to the trial Court to decide the matter within a period of six months w.e.f. today after affording short adjournments. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.19 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   The trial Court shall sympathetically consider exemption from personal appearance of the petitioners on their moving the Court with such a request.

 $
    &'&()*%


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.19 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court