Vikas Tulsian And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And ANR.

CRM-M-36131-2011 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36131-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 23, 2015 Vikas Tulsian and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Aftab Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. P.S. Ghuman, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.

Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that during pendency of the present petition before this Court, better sense has prevailed and the informant/respondent No. 2, Pushp Jain, has sorted out his dispute with the petitioners and has no objection if the impugned FIR and all the consequential proceedings are terminated on the basis of settlement arrived at between both the private factions. They are also ad idem that the offence punishable under Section 420, IPC, is compoundable with permission of the Court. It has also been conceded that basically it was a case of business transactions.

PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.09.23 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-36131-2011 (O&M) In view of above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court that if an application is presented before it for compounding of the offence, then the same shall be allowed after recording the statement of the informant/aggrieved person.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE September 23, 2015 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.09.23 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document