← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32672/2016allowed

Parveen Kumar v. State Of Haryana

2016-09-23Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32672-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: September 23, 2016 Parveen Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr. Vikrant Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the respondent-State.

Mr. Sanjiv Sheoran, Advocate, for the complainant.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner - Parveen Kumar has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.410 dated 17.08.2016, registered at Police Station City Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 506 IPC. Notice of motion was issued in this case.

Mr. Vikramjit Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and Mr. Sanjiv Sheoran, Advocate has appeared on behalf of the complainant and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Advocate General, Haryana as well as learned counsel for the complainant and have gone through the record. Satyawan 2016.09.24 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-32672-2016 -2At the time of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the complainant has already effected compromise with the petitioner. Counsel for the complainant has also stated that the compromise has been effected with the present petitioner. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the parties have effected compromise and the petitioner is not required for any custodial investigation or interrogation as the case is based on documentary evidence, I find merit in this petition and the same is allowed.

It is ordered that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. 23.09.2016 (INDERJIT SINGH) sp JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2016.09.24 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh