Pawandeep Kaur And ORS. v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M No. 31862 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 31862 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- January 15, 2018 Pawandeep Kaur and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.
*** Learned counsel for the petitioners states that Gurcharan Singh had gone abroad after joining the investigation in this case without seeking permission by the Court for the reason that there was an emergent situation on account of delivery of his daughter in law.
Learned State counsel has placed on file order passed by SDJM Nabha to the effect that no such permission was sought or granted by the trial Magistrate.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he be permitted to withdraw the petition qua petitioner Gurcharan Singh. Permission is granted. The petition qua petitioner Gurcharan Singh stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that remaining petitioners have since joined the investigation and have complied with the directions issued by this Court, therefore, they are not required for further investigation by the local police. This fact is conceded by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Inderjit Singh. He states that the petitioner are not required for further Parvinder Singh 2018.01.15 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M No. 31862 of 2017 investigation.
Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioners Pawandeep Kaur, Shingara Singh, Sinder Singh and Shamsher Singh on 30.08.2017 is made absolute, subject to their fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition stands allowed accordingly.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE January 15, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.01.15 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh