Juber v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-31894-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31894-2014 Date of Decision: September 24, 2015 Juber

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Harkesh Kumar Yadav, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent.

Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the informant.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that both the private factions have amicably sorted out their dispute and effected a compromise.

PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.09.24 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-31894-2014 Learned counsel for the informant submits that in view of the compromise so effected, he has no objection if the interim directions issued by this Court vide order dated 5.11.2014, are made absolute.

Learned counsel for the State after taking instructions from ASI Amar Singh of Police Station, Tauru, District Mewat, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and no more required for custodial interrogation. He further submits that both the private parties have sorted out their dispute and effected a compromise.

In view of above, the present petition is allowed. The interim directions issued by this Court vide order dated 5.11.2014 are made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2), Cr.P.C. (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE September 24, 2015 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.09.24 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document