Mahesh Kumar v. State Of Punjab

   

      
 

   

 

  

   

 !

"    #$ 

        

   % & $

'()

    

'()

   $     *   *'((&' !

" Mr. Gian Chand Garg, Advocate for respondent No.3.

  !"

# + ,  $   )-  .

  $       "  -   (

-  /0 
 

%  

 .

  


 1

2  $ 2$ *2  340

0  4 5(6

47 8

 ' 

 .

  

  



  2  $  2

 / -   $-   

- )" 

  .  )"

$ 9 $ 

 
 -2.      - 9$  ' 2

 "

 2

 9"  $   !

" $ -

 



  )# -'+:4  - 2

  9    

$  $

  -2.    ;+<$  

  Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner is decided by respondent No.3 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. NEHA 2026.03.23 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

$%&'()%((* %(% 3.

Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice as well as counsel appearing for respondent No.3, submit that they have no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.3 for time-bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order. 4.

Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording him an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.3. 5.

Disposed of, accordingly.

"  #  

()((*    $ *2/    =/3    $

"-  =/3 NEHA 2026.03.23 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh