Pale Ram v. Raghbir And ANR

CRM-M-32012-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32012-2014 Date of Decision: September 24, 2015 Pale Ram Saini

...Petitioner

Versus

Raghbir and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1.

Mr. Harkesh Kumar Yadav, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 2.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the compromise effected between the private parties, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. He prays for withdrawal of the same.

PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.09.24 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-32012-2014 Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to withdrawal of the present petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE September 24, 2015 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.09.24 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document