Pankaj Chandgothia v. Union Of India And ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on- PI L No. 77 of 2019 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 11. 04. 2019 Pankaj Chandgot hi a, Advocat e .... . Pet i t i oner ver sus Uni on of I ndi a and ot her s . . . . . Respondent s CORAM: - HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI , JUDGE Pr esent :

Shr i Pankaj Chandgot hi a, Advocat e/ pet i t i oner i n per son . .

KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE: ( Or al ) At t he out set , t he pet i t i oner , who i s appear i ng i n per son, st at es t hat t he r epr esent at i on made by hi m i n r espect of t he gr i evances r ai sed i n t hi s pet i t i on i s pendi ng bef or e t he Admi ni st r at or , Uni on Ter r i t or y, Chandi gar h and he has been i nf or med vi de e- mai l dat ed 09. 04. 2019 t hat t he mat t er has been f or war ded t o t he Advi sor f or t aki ng appr opr i at e act i on on t he r epr esent at i on.

Si nce t he Advi ser i s al r eady sei zed wi t h t he mat t er , i n t he f act s and ci r cumst ances, we ar e of t he consi der ed opi ni on t hat t hi s pet i t i on has l ost i t s ef f i cacy and i s r ender ed i nf r uct uous at t hi s st age. Accor di ngl y, t he same st ands di smi ssed at t hi s st age.

We hope and t r ust t hat an appr opr i at e deci si on i n t he mat t er shal l be t aken by t he Advi ser expedi t i ousl y. ( KRI SHNA MURARI ) CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

11. 04. 2019 par kash NOTE:

Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO PARKASH CHAND 2019.04.12 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

PARKASH CHAND 2019.04.12 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document