Nikita v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31996-2017 Date of decision: 15.09.2017 Nikita

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to official respondents, especially respondent No.5, to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 2 to 4, who on the behest of respondents No. 6 to 13 are harassing the petitioner. In this regard, she has also approached the authorities by way of representation dated 10.08.2017 (Annexure P-7). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.5 be directed to look into the representation dated 10.08.2017 (Annexure P-7), in a time bound manner. Notice of motion.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, learned AAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Three copies of the petition be served upon her by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day failing which no action is called for. Satyawan 2017.09.15 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-31996-2017 -2Heard.

Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 to decide the representation dated 10.08.2017 (Annexure P-7), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law and if required, necessary protection be given. 15.09.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2017.09.15 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh