High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32899/2016allowed

Sunita v. State Of Haryana

2017-01-16Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-32899-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32899-2016 Date of Decision:- 16.01.2017 Sunita ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. APS Deol, Senior Advocate with Mr. H.S. Deol, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Varun Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Present petition is for release of petitioner on regular bail in FIR No.139 dated 11.07.2016, under Sections 304-B and 498-A read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Rampura, District Rewari. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2016 and no useful purpose would be served to further detain her in jail.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from investigating officer, has informed that out of total 14 witnesses, 9 witnesses have been examined, two have been given up and only two formal witnesses are now Naresh Kumar 2017.01.18 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh required to be examined.

CRM-M-32899-2016 -2I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and with their able assistance gone through the material available on record. The petitioner was arrested on 02.08.2016. Since then, she is in judicial custody and no useful purpose would be served to further detain her in jail.

In view of above facts and keeping in view the statement made by the complainant, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on her furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge/Duty Magistrate, Rewari.

Needless to mention that, nothing observed here-in-above, would reflect, on merits in the trial of the main case, in any manner. January 16, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.01.18 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh