Amarnath v. State Of Haryana And ORS.




    
       Date of decision: 18th May, 2015  Amarnath  Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others  Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. R.S. Bajwa, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 7.

 !
"#  $ It is duly admitted by both sides that trial has since been finished and accused petitioner has since been acquitted, thus, nothing survives in this petition and the same has been rendered infructuous.

Dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

#  !
$   %&'" (
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.19 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court