← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/8396/2024disposed of

M/S Dashmesh Steel Rolling Mills v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2024-04-24Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

2024:PHHC:055466 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8396 of 2024 Date of Decision: 24.04.2024 M/s Dashmesh Steel Rolling Mills ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ ***

Present:

Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No.6 and 7.

*** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed for directing respondent No.1 to decide the appeal of petitioner in a time bound manner filed under Section 237 of Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 titled as 'M/s Dashmesh Steel Rolling Mills v/s Deputy Commissioner, Fatehgarh Sahib and others' as the said appeal dated 15.01.2024 was filed on 08.02.2024 (Annexure P-16) being diary No.1302 dated 08.02.2024 along with interim prayer, however even after a gap of almost 2 months, neither prayer for interim relief has been decided nor appeal filed by the petitioner has been decided. Further prayer has been made that during the pendency of appeal pending before respondent No.1, possession of the suit property may kindly be restored to petitioner as the possession of suit property has been taken without there being any ejectment order passed by any Competent Court or any order passed under Public Premises Act and for staying the operation of impugned RITTU 2024.04.25 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.8396 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:055466 agenda issued by respondent No.7 dated 07.03.2024 (Annexure P-17) bearing item No.11(a) (Annexure P-8) regarding construction of eat street (food court) on the suit land.

It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the appeal under Section 237 of Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 was filed before respondent No.1 on 08.02.2024 but till date, the same has not been listed for hearing.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, Mr. Navneet Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab and Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Advocate appear and accept the notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5-State and respondents No.6 & 7, respectively.

Heard.

On hearing learned counsel for both the parties and perusing the record, it is apparent that though the appeal has been filed before respondent No.1 but till date, no date of hearing has been given by the Appellate Authority.

In view of the above position, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Local Government Department, Municipal Bhawan, Chandigarh to fix the appeal filed by the petitioner for hearing by 15.05.2024 and decide the stay application in accordance with law subject to objections if any. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 24.04.2024 JUDGE rittu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RITTU 2024.04.25 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document