Bhateri v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-33224 of 2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-33224 of 2018 Date of Decision: 09.8.2018 Bhateri ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Ivan Singh Khosa, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 298 dated 18.8.2017 registered at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat, Haryana under Sections 304-B, 34 IPC.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is in custody since October 2017 and the private witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution version. He refers to the statements available on record.

State counsel submits that all the private witnesses including the complainant have not supported the prosecution version. It is stated that the mother was not cited as a witness in this case. In view of the above and without commenting anything on the merits of the case and considering the fact that the trial will take time to conclude, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released GURPREET SINGH 2018.08.10 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-33224 of 2018 -2on bail on her furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE August 09, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.08.10 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh