Narinder Kumar v. Union Of India And Others

CWP-8695-2023 (O&M) -12023:PHHC:165196

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8695-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22.12.2023 Narinder Kumar ......... Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.S.K.Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Karan Kumar Jund, Sr.Panel Counsel for respondents No.1 to 3-UOI.

Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kang, AAG, Punjab.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India is seeking directions to the respondents to re-issue passport.

2.

The petitioner was issued passport on 22.03.2004 which expired on 21.03.2014. The petitioner applied for re-issuance of passport. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that application of the petitioner has already been closed and if petitioner files fresh application, it would be decided in accordance with law. 4.

Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition with liberty to file afresh application before the passport authority.

Anju Goel 2023.12.22 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-8695-2023 (O&M) -22023:PHHC:165196 5.

Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. 6.

Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 22.12.2023 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2023.12.22 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh