← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/15064/2026disposed of

Varun Kumar @ Pindi v. State Of Punjab And Another

2026-04-30Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.15064 of 2026 Date of decision: 30.04.2026 Varun Kumar @ Pindi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab.

***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponds to Section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.209 dated 24.10.2024, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 191(3), 190, 324(4) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 (earlier Sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 427 and 487 IPC) and offence Section 118(2) BNS, 2023 (Section 326 IPC) added later on registered at Police Station Beas, District Amritsar Rural. 2.

This Court vide order dated 24.03.2026 granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 24.03.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4.

Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and NEETU RANI 2026.04.30 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD

CRM-M No.15064 of 2026 -2further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in the present case.

5.

In view of the above, the order dated 24.03.2026 is made absolute.

6.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 7.

All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 30.04.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.04.30 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD