Tarsem Kumar v. State Of Punjab




    
    

   Date of decision: 3rd November, 2015  Tarsem Kumar

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

Respondent  !  "#  $
  $
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

 $
%

#  Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Tarsem Kumar in case FIR No.180 dated 21.05.2015 registered at Police Station Jodhewal, District Ludhiana under Section 306 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the orders of interim bail dated 09.10.2015 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigations which is not controverted by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Balbir Singh, who submits that the petitioner is no longer required for further RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.04 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

 investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of what has been stated above and in the light of orders passed earlier, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 09.10.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petition stands disposed off accordingly.

 $
    &'()'*%


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.04 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court