Aashish Luthra & ORS. v. State Of Punjab & ANR.

CRM-M-37120-2010 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37120-2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 11, 2016 Aashish Luthra and others ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Bipan Ghai, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mandeep Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.P.S.Paul, DAG, Punjab.

.....

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned senior counsel submits that as per the information received, during pendency of the present petition the charges were framed by learned trial Court and the said order has been challenged by the petitioner by way of criminal revision petition before the Court of Session and, as such, the pendency of the present petition would not be fruitful. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of MEENU 2016.01.13 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-37120-2010 -2the fact that charges have been framed and the said order has been challenged by way of criminal revision petition before the Court of Session and, as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

There appears to be force in the submission of the learned counsel for the State and, as such, the present petition is disposed of at this stage.

January 11, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.01.13 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh