Shiv Kumari Tanwar v. State Of Haryana And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33415 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION :- January 30, 2020 Shiv Kumari Tanwar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Kuldeep Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Rohit Rana, Advocate for Mr. Kunar Dawar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. *** Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the present petition has become infructuous since the appeal in question has been finally decided by Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad on 27.3.2019, inasmuch as the appeal has been dismissed.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2-complainant, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE January 30, 2020 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2020.01.31 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh