Surender Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP No.10875 of 2019 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10875 of 2019 Date of decision:30.08.2019 Surender Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. V.M.Handa, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Prayer in present writ petition is for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to treat the earned leave period (183 days) of the petitioner from 26.07.2016 to 24.01.2017 as duty period as he did not avail it.

Notice of motion.

On asking of Court, Mr. R.K.Doon, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State.

Mr.V.M.Handa, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide legal notice dated 04.09.2018 (Annexure P-9) within some specified time. SAVITA KADIAN 2019.08.30 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.10875 of 2019 {2} In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into merit of case or commenting thereon, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice dated 04.09.2018 (Annexure P-9) by passing a well reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case, representation is not decided within aforementioned specified time, there shall be costs of Rs.25,000/- to be paid by the concerned officer to the petitioner.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 30, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.08.30 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh