High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/33466/2018allowed

Pritam v. State Of Haryana

2018-09-26Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih2 pages

CRM-M-33466-2018 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-33466 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 26, 2018 Pritam ..........PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ........RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Ms. Dimple Jain, A.A.G. Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 115 dated 04.04.2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 186, 307, 332, 342, 353, 395 and 397 of Indian Penal Code and 25 of Arms Act, at Police Station Badhra, District Charkhi Dadri. Heard.

Learned State counsel argues that petitioner was in the group of assailants which had attacked the police party to get relieved co-accused Ajit, who was apprehended with liquor. On his disclosure statement, a Dalla having 125 boxes of countrymade liquor was recovered. The petitioner was arrested in this case on 04.04.2018. His coaccused Narinder, Mahesh, Ajit and Vijay have already been released on SACHIN MEHTA 2018.09.26 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-33466-2018 -2regular bail. Recovery has already been effected from the petitioner and there is no specific allegation of causing injuries to police party against him. Keeping in view the above facts but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and that conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner Pritam is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:- a. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

b. In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

c. He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) September 26, 2018 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No SACHIN MEHTA 2018.09.26 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH