Sham Sunder v. Anita Dhingra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 110A CRM-M-33402 of 2016 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- 06.11.2024 Sham Sunder

...Petitioner

Versus

Anita Dhingra and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate with Mr. Lakshay Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate for the respondents.

*** SUMEET GOEL , J.

(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant petition as a compromise deed has been entered into between the parties, terms whereof have been reduced into writing vide a deed dated 01.09.2023. Dismissed as withdrawn, for the nonce.

The parties are at liberty to seek revival of the petition on showing sufficient cause.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 06.11.2024 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2024.11.06 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment