Vipin v. Kavita Kumari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM No.M-32641 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 23, 2015 Vipin

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Kavita Kumari

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.K.K.Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for transfer of petition under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the respondent to the competent court of law at Gurgaon from the Sessions Court Bhiwani.

At the time of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner argued only on one point that Kavita Kumari respondent is residing at Gurgaon and petitioner under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been filed by her at Bhiwani only to harass the present petitioner. It is also argued that another proceeding is pending at Gurgaon. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the record, I find that inconvenience of the husband is not to be seen. The respondent-wife, who has filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. at Bhiwani, is also to attend the proceedings at VINEET GULATI 2015.09.24 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-32641 of 2015 -2Bhiwani and it looks improbable that wife, who is residing at Gurgaon, will intentionally file the proceedings at Bhiwani for harassing the husband, which is inconvenient for the wife also. In view of the above discussion, I do not find any ground to transfer the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. from the Sessions Court Bhiwani to Sessions Court, Gurgaon.

Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

September 23, 2015 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE VINEET GULATI 2015.09.24 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh