Neelam Devi v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32683 of 2017 Date of Decision: 24.05.2019 Neelam Devi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. K.S. Khehar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through instant petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for cancellation of regular bail granted to respondent No.2 in case FIR No.292 dated 17.11.2016 registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 427, 506 IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act at Police Station Chandimandir, Panchkula. Learned State counsel submits that instant petition has rendered infructuous in view of filing cancellation report against respondent No.2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (RAMENDRA JAIN) May 24, 2019 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2019.05.24 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document