Satish Kumar Garg v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CM CM CM CM-1364 1364-CWP CWP CWP CWP-2020 in/and 2020 in/and 2020 in/and 2020 in/and CWP CWP CWP CWP-9845 9845-2019 (O&M) 2019 (O&M) 2019 (O&M) 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 10, 2020 Date of Decision: February 10, 2020 Date of Decision: February 10, 2020 Date of Decision: February 10, 2020 Satish Kumar Garg ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE Present: Mr. Ishaan Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ravi Shanker Jha, Chief Ravi Shanker Jha, Chief Ravi Shanker Jha, Chief Ravi Shanker Jha, Chief Justice Justice Justice Justice (Oral) (Oral) (Oral) (Oral) For the reasons mentioned in CM-1364-CWP-2020, the same is allowed. Civil Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the reasons mentioned in the application for withdrawal.

(Ravi Sha (Ravi Sha (Ravi Sha (Ravi Shanker Jha) nker Jha) nker Jha) nker Jha) Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice February 10, 2020 February 10, 2020 February 10, 2020 February 10, 2020 (Arun Palli) (Arun Palli) (Arun Palli) (Arun Palli) vkd Judge Judge Judge Judge Whether speaking / reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No VIRENDER KUMAR 2020.02.11 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document