← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/15356/2026allowed

Ansh Kumar v. State Of Punjab

2026-04-30Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel2 pages

CRM-M No.15356 of 2026 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M No.15356 of 2026 Date of decision : 30.4.2026 Date of uploading : 30.4.2026 Ansh Kumar .............Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Pardeep Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. AG, Punjab --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) 1.

On 20.3.2026, the following order was passed: 'Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.159 dated 11.10.2025 under Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), 191(3), 190, 351(2) OF BNS, (EARLIER 307, 341, 323, 148, 149, 506 OF IPC), Police Station Anaj Mandi, District Patiala; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated into the FIR in question as there was a dispute between the rival parties on account of neighborhood issue, the case in hand pertaining to version and cross-version & the petitioner is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein as per law. Notice of motion.

On the strength of advance notice; Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent-State of Punjab. Adjourned to 28.04.2026.

The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 25.03.2026 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.04.30 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.15356 of 2026 -2interim bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the petitioner shall join the investigation. He shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.' 2.

Learned State counsel (on instructions) submits that pursuant to the order dated 20.3.2026, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation.

3.

In view of the above, the instant petition is allowed. Interim order dated 20.3.2026, passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS. 4.

This order should not be treated as "blanket" order. It will not be read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence. 5.

Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS or upon showing any other sufficient cause.

6.

Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 30.4.2026 Ashwanii Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.04.30 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document