Nidhi And ANR v. Ut Administration, Chd And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 4202 of 2022 Date of Decision: 06.05.2022 Nidhi and another .......... Petitioners

Versus

U.T. Administration, Chandigarh and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Akshay Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Paul, Additional Public Prosecutor, U.T., Chandigarh **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of a mandamus hence directing respondent No. 2 to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, and against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondents No. 3 to 5 (wrongly mentioned in petition as co-respondents No. 3, 5 & 6). 2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to the respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-3. 3.

Consequently, this Court directs the respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-3, through a speaking order.

4.

Petition is disposed of.

5.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

May 06, 2022 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2022.05.06 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document