Chukuwma Hazekalah Emmaunel @ John Morrisan v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-33697 of 2016 (O&M) .....

Date of decision:27.9.2016 Chukuwma Hezekalah Emmaunel alias John Morrisan

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.228 dated 10.4.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 420, 120-B, 467, 468 and 471 IPC and Sections 3/14 of Foreign Act at Police Station DLF Qutub Enclave, Gurgaon, District Gurgaon.

Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.09.28 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-33697 of 2016 [2] learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondent-State and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that as per the prosecution version the FIR was got registered on the statement of Alka Kumar. As per the allegation, the present petitioner cheated the complainant for about `6,80,000/- plus `9,30,000/-. It is in the FIR that the complainant got decided to get married to the accused etc.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.4.2016 and is not required for investigation and interrogation purposes, the trial of the case will take long time, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

September 27, 2016.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.09.28 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh