High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/33768/2016disposed of

Pritam Singh v. State Of Punjab And ANR

2016-09-22Mr. Justice Krishna Murari1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Cr. Misc. M 33768 of 2016 Date of decision: 22.9.2016 Pritam Singh Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab and anr Respondent

Present:

Ms. Jigyasa Tanwar, Advocate.

Ms. Vandana Kaur, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J.

Notice of motion to the respondents. On asking of the court, Ms. H.K.Athwal, DAG, Punjab has accepted notice. Copy given. Complainant is also represented through counsel. Since challan has not been presented, it will be open to the complainant to approach the investigating officer with a supplementary challan, voluntarily. If any such supplementary statement is recorded, the same would be taken into consideration by the investigating officer, as per mandate of Section 163(2) Cr.P.C., who may opt to file cancellation report before the Illaqa Magistrate.

September 22 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No Tapinder Singh Mann 2016.09.22 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document