Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. M/S Madan Lal Wadhwa And Co.

 



   
              

 !"

#!$%&#'%$(%$"!

% )!

* *** #!

!

% #$ +#$   , "

"

)"&-"

./""

%* *** # (%

# !   0  

 !"

#!$%&#'%$(%$"!

% )!

* *** #!

!

% #$ +#$   , "$1"! "''$ !)"&  *** # (%

# !  2 3) * 4
4 +
4)



   !" #
$  " %  &" 

 '($ )"%# !
$ *"


(+ )"%#
$#

 '( ) ,("-#
$#

 ./ !+"#
$ 

 ! !-#
$  " % 
 0  " % 
 +
4)5*  2"  "-- %  &" " &$  %  "3 $-$   4(  -*  

   5 " /  $# (- %  &+ / 
  6 % " & - ( !  7  "
&  )-
# 887#  " 9"
  %%   
&  )(-  " % (&  "   ( 
+ 

  ::8:7#
;( # *   &* " %# *"&3 " % * %%   -  - -  (%%-3  /    %(%  (- -#  < (&  "  %(  &* " %   $- ( * - &3 " % =% %%# % -  %%- ( ! :  "
    "   
& % -  %-3 %%+ " %%-  &3   # " 2- )( % " %%-   " %(  >(  
&# "*$# " %+ & "
& (-  -(  " (3 %  "  %-  " %+ ;% < (&  " "  $--  " )( 3 >(+   #
;( # %  )7 ?# " )( % " $ % - &3 " %#   "  %(+    " %  / %%% %  %%    *
&  % "

#
;(
 !@

- &3 " % *   &3 " !(%  )( &3   #
;(  )(- (&  "  "   " - %%
&   # %  -  / %%    *
&

 

 =%  &3 " )(# " % " &  &3 " % &3 -+  %-3# *" & + " %  #  " & (&  " " % "  $ 3  ( !   "
 %  $/+ " %*  " )( ( !  7#


 " & / " " -  " %  & &3   7 6 "$ " (-  " %   " %$ (&  ? !   "
 %(-  ( 

  
 


-     
 

 
 




 

 


 

   

 
  

    
            




  

 : 6  $  " &$ %$ " &- %+  %   %(    "   *""  4(  + " %(  &  $ &3 " % 0 # "#   4(    %  + " %+ ( "
 6  $/+ " & -(   $ (% " %# & %+    8   - &   " &$  " -" <+" )( 
 

     2017 SCC Online Del 7228:- 25. A plain reading of the above provision indicates that except where the parties have agreed to the contrary, the date of commencement of arbitration proceedings would be the date on which the recipient of

  the notice (the Petitioner herein) receives from the claimant a request for referring the dispute to arbitration. The object behind the provision is not difficult to discern. The party to the arbitration agreement against whom a claim is made, should know what the claims are. It is possible that in response to the notice, the recipient of the notice may accept some of the claims either wholly or in part, and the disputes between the parties may thus get narrowed down. That is one aspect of the matter. The other is that such a notice provides an opportunity to the recipient of the notice to point out if some of the claims are time barred, or barred by any law or untenable in fact and/or that there are counter-claims and so on.

26. Thirdly, and importantly, where the parties have agreed on a procedure for the appointment of an arbitrator, unless there is such a notice invoking the arbitration clause, it will not be possible to know whether the procedure as envisaged in the arbitration clause has been followed. Invariably, arbitration clauses do not contemplate the unilateral appointment of an arbitrator by one of the parties. There has to be a consensus. The notice under Section 21 serves an important purpose of facilitating a consensus on the appointment of an arbitrator.

27. Fourthly, even assuming that the clause permits one of the parties to choose the arbitrator, even then it is necessary for the party making such appointment to let the other party know in advance the name of the person it proposes to appoint. It is quite possible that such person may be 'disqualified' to act an arbitrator for various reasons. On receiving such notice, the recipient of the notice may be able to point out this

  defect and the claimant may be persuaded to appoint a qualified person. This will avoid needless wastage of time in arbitration proceedings being conducted by a person not qualified to do so. The second, third and fourth reasons outlined above are consistent with the requirements of natural justice which, in any event, govern arbitral proceedings.

28. Lastly, for the purposes of Section 11(6) of the Act, without the notice under Section 21 of the Act, a party seeking reference of disputes to arbitration will be unable to demonstrate that there was a failure by one party to adhere to the procedure and accede to the request for the appointment of an arbitrator. The trigger for the Court's jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Act is such failure by one party to respond.

 2" >(+   " -" <+" )( " & --*    

    

 ! "   #$## !!    %&#$   '

() !       "

   #$## !!  !*$*+  (+ " %3  " %# % " -  --( %%- + "   &> " &  &3 " %     $ 3 "- +-"# " % " $       #
;(
# (% " % 6 # "# %% "   * $  " % %  %%"+ " )( ( !  7  "
 2" $    ( !   "
 (+ " %3  "  %    "   !   "
 2" %  $/+ !  7  "
 ( " (    (% " "     *" " %  "3 3  

 7 $# " %   %% 
&#  ( (  " %  -  % /+ %%  6 " &   ( !   "
# "  %  % (    &- 
 " - 4(   !   "
 "  &  %- *"#  %     % ( <*$# -&3  +  " %  %%" " )( +#   $#   %-3+ *" " 4(   " ( 
-- " %+ %%-  %     4 +
4) 

  A"" !%/+B CB0 A"" %&- CB0