Reena Rao v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-8934-2020 (O & M) Date of decision: 21.07.2020 Reena Rao ..... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Haryana and anr.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH
Present:
Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl.A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, Advocate, for respondent No.3-HSIDC. ***** Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Due to prevailing situation of COVID-19, matter has been heard through Video Conferencing.
At the outset, Mr. Moudgil submits that the matter can be considered by the concerned authority as to the price that would be payable for the plot whether at the old rates or the new rates. This proposal is acceptable to Mr. Sangwan.
We, thus, remit the matter to the concerned authority. The present petition shall be treated as representation of the petitioner. After considering the grounds raised therein, the concerned authority shall take an impartial and fair decision as per law within a period of one month. Disposed of.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE (KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE July 21, 2020 sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2020.07.22 01:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document