Ganpat Singh v. Jagmal Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** RSA-3802-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision:11.11.2025 Ganpat Singh &..Appellant Vs.

Bhim and Others .&.Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant.

Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 28.05.2001.

**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representa on on behalf of the appellant. Even on last two dates of hearing, nobody has appeared for the appellant. It appears that appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu on.

(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE November 11, 2025 Nee ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.11.11 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document