← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/15659/2026dismissed

Rajinder Kumar Tiwari v. State Of Punjab

2026-04-02Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla4 pages

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 

CRM-M-15659-2026 Decided on: 02.04.2026 

    

......Petitioner Versus    

 ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA

Present:

Mr. Angrej Singh

 

 **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 



    

 

 

     !  "#!$!%

&     ' 

 ()*#!   !+$!$!, 

     $, !$  )-     %  



  

  .*   /  !$ 

        0  1

 0  . 2 3/ !



  

        4         * %$+ &  

2  

      

      

  4   

  4 '

-2- %  

   

       

 



'4   

 

   4

  

 '  4  4   * ! &  

  4   & 

  ' 6

 4 

78 

    

     4  7     

4    

  4    4 

 

  

     4     

  ' 6 .

/  '  4    

   

 

 

7 

 '    

    '

  

   '  #  4  + ) 

       

              

  3     

       

     '     

 8

4    the present petitioner had taken an amount of Rs.2.25 lakh through bank transaction and Rs.80,000/- in cash from the complainant, by assuring him to send his son abroad. It is further contended that the present petitioner is involved in two more FIRs of similar nature and has duped a number of people. In the present case, an inquiry was conducted and the petitioner was given an opportunity to explain his position but he did not come forward to cooperate with the investigating agency. It is further contended that the petitioner is required

-3for custodial interrogation to collect evidence for the success of prosecution. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the present petition seeking anticipatory bail. ,  :

   8      4 

  

  

         

 

     

 

     

            4       * %$+ &

  

  4  ;

 7 

 

   

 

'  

      

 

  4 '  4 

  

2       



 7    

 

 4



    4       4 '7   

             8 4  ()*   4     

  

   7  

  

 6 



  8

 

'  4 )   

       9;

 - 4 <   4       

  '     4' 

  4 

4



4' 

  4        '          8   8

3   '   

     ' 8



 4'   4

 

-4-

 8    '    

   

 

      

     '

 '

 

  

'

 9.

Nothing observed herein shall be construed as  2

 '  -

 4'   (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 02.04.2026 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO  Whether Reportable:

YES/NO