Nidhi Walia v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18438-2023 Date of Decision: 17.04.2023 Nidhi Walia ......... PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Pranav Handa, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Mr. Harsimar Singh SiƩa, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akshay Chadha, Advocate and Ms. Taanvi Dhull, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟon 16.02.2023 Sadar Phagwara, 406, 379, 447, 506 IPC District Kapurthala 1.

The peƟƟoner apprehending arrest in the FIR capƟoned above, has come up before this Court under SecƟon 438 CrPC seeking anƟcipatory bail. 2.

Counsel for the State as well as complainant has opposed the maintainability of the present peƟƟon in the absence of disclosure of criminal history. 3.

At this stage, counsel for the peƟƟoner wants to withdraw the present peƟƟon with liberty to file fresh with beƩer parƟculars. 4.

Given above, present peƟƟon stands disposed of having been withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. It is clarified that in case, the peƟƟoner wants to add more parƟculars in the peƟƟon, he is allowed to do so. All pending miscellaneous applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 17.04.2023 JyoƟ-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2023.04.18 09:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.