State Of Punjab v. Raman Uppal




    
         Date of decision: 27th November, 2015  State of Punjab

Petitioner

Versus

Raman Uppal

Respondent  !  "#  $
  $
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Ms. Reeta Kohli, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab with Mr. Hanspal Virk, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for the petitioner.

Ms. Diya Sodhi, Advocate for the respondent.

 $
% Petitioner/State has come up in this petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. seeking cancellation of pre8arrest bail granted to respondent Raman Uppal vide order dated 13.08.2014 passed in CRM8M No.22223 of 2014 in a case registered by way of FIR No.125 dated 10.06.2014 under Sections 406/420 IPC pertaining to Police Station Phase I, SAS Nagar, Mohali.

It is undisputedly agreed by the two sides that the present FIR has been registered by one Narinder Singh claiming to be the RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.01 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



     Director of M/s International Customers Related Management Services Private Limited (ICRMS) regarding a dispute over the Company between the various constituents of the Company. It is also not put to question that another case by way of FIR No.69 dated 19.04.2012 has been registered at Police Station Sector 3, Chandigarh for commission of offences under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/1208B IPC.

In the light of detailed judgment dated 16.09.2015 passed by this Court in CRM8M No.1720 of 2013 titled as 'Madan Singh and another v. UT Chandigarh and others', whereby this Court has highlighted how this dispute over running of the same very Company has led to filing of different FIRs, each by a different set of complainants, solely with the purpose to undo the effects of the other FIRs so registered against them and in view of the piquant situation that has creeped in, this Court had constituted a Special Investigation Team to investigate the entire dispute between the parties over this Company and its allied functions by way of rejuvenated investigations and who shall be at liberty to register fresh FIR on the basis of available evidence documentary or oral and till any conclusive findings are arrived at by the SIT so constituted, the present matter having become infructuous stands disposed off as such.

 $
    &'()'*+% 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.01 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court