Abhinav Shukla v. State Of Haryana

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 101+214 Date of Decision:- 05.05.2025 ABHINAV SHUKLA ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :

Mr. Swarn Tiwana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh, A.A.G. Haryana.

 
 

   ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) CRM-17771-2025 In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed. Section 109 BNS is ordered to be added in the headnote as well as prayer clause of the petition. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments.

Disposed of.

CRM-M-16685-2025 By way of present petition filed under Section 482 BNSS, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under: 
 

  

   



   

 !"# $ % 

!"

  &' () *++,

-2-  -)

 

./  +)        )  ). ) /  ) 0   )       1-2/+/).  .+ 0 +   )   )  3) 3  ,)   1-2 0 )+.)     )    /       ),    )  /    ,   /.     

    +)  ))) ./  +)    3   ,  /)+. ./ ) )    ,+    ) /)  445', 6, /3)0   +)  ,   ) 7+    )

))+ /) ))) . 



 ) ,   )  +),  

  ) )    )       )    ) +      

  ,3)   3  ) , 

3   6,/   . ) . 3       5     $8% )) 3 3   3   3) , ,. ,  )  3    )  )53 )))3  

 )),  ) 9+ 5   

+/ )   + 3  +)+)5      3))  )  5     )+   ))+ )  

-3- 8+)  33)) /  1-25 +/ )+) ./ 3)  , +)+ 5   +  3)+  445',   445',    ) /) 6, /3) 5    +)  ,   ) 7+     ) )  -   )  +) )  ) ,    ) +)  +   , /  ).) 

) ) + +   ,/. )) 7+    )   ./ )))  7.

Any observation made above shall not be construed as opinion of this Court on the merits of the case.

(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 05.05.2025 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No