Sohan Lal And ANR v. Bank Of India And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10062-2019 Date of decision : 12.04.2019 Sohan Lal and another ........ Petitioners VS Bank of India and another ...... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr.Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The prayer made in this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing the auction notice (Annexure P-2) issued by respondents.

2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the bank or pursue alternative remedies, in accordance with law.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL ) 12.04.2019 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No -19ANJU 2019.04.22 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc